У кожного народу стільки неба над головою - скільки землі під ногами!

Міжнародна

асоціація україністів

 

 mau-nau@ukr.net

написати листа

 

International association
 of Ukrainian studies

Головна Новини Про МАУ Конгреси МАУ Національні асоціації україністів

Україністика у світі Конференції Родом з України Контакти

 

VI Êîíãðåñ ̳æíàðîäíî¿ àñîö³àö³¿ óêðà¿í³ñò³â

(Äîíåöüê, 29 ÷åðâíÿ – 2 ëèïíÿ 2005 ð.)

 

 

²ÑÒÎвß

×àñòèíà 2


 

Iryna Prybytkova
(Kyiv)
MIGRATION PATTERNS AND POLICIES IN UKRAINE
 
Abstract
Based on available experience in the sphere of migration research and migration management, the author of this report sought to provide the general summary of migration situation in Ukraine in 2002-2004 from a diverse array of often unrelated migration processes of different nature, development patterns, underlying conditions and implications. As the methodological framework for a holistic picture of migration developments in Ukraine, the migration-related legislation of the country was used. The legislation served as a "bearing construction" for the present report: each sections or paragraphs of the report are firmly based on relevant migration-related laws and implementing regulations.
• In 2004, the overall number of registered migration movements within Ukraine (i.e. all migrants, regardless of their destinations, regions, countries and settlement types) reached more than 1.5 million (1,586,373 persons). Internal (inter-regional and intra-regional) population movements represent the overwhelming majority of all migration movements in Ukraine - or 94.7% of all migration movements. The share of inter-state migration exchanges (including both CIS counties and non-CIS countries) reaches only 5.3% of all migration movements (comparatively to 92.3% and 7.7%, respectively, in 2002).
• Migration losses of Ukraine are mainly associated with migration exchanges with non-CIS countries. In recent years, these migration losses demonstrated a decreasing trend: for example, in comparison to 2000, migration losses of Ukraine due to migration exchanges with non-CIS countries decreased in 2.5 times in 2003 (from 40.7 thousand to 16.4 thousand persons), while migration losses due to migration exchanges with CIS-countries increased in 1.3 times (from 5.9 thousand to 7.8 thousand persons). Migration exchanges with non-CIS countries are mainly represented by emigration to Germany, the United States and Israel.
• The emigration to non-CIS countries is associated with both quantitative and qualitative population losses, because emigrants are mainly represented by persons of employable age with high education levels.
• As earlier, the range of key migration partners of Ukraine incorporate the Russian Federation, Belarus, Moldova, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. The largest migration exchanges exist between Ukraine and the Russian Federation and every year Ukraine gradually losses its citizens. Comparing to the period of 1999-2000, migration losses of Ukraine to the Russian Federation substantially increased. Annual population losses in the migration exchange with Belarus, which also has a net migration surplus in migration exchange with Ukraine, tend to decrease gradually. In migration exchanges with all other CIS countries and the Baltic States, Ukraine has a net migration surplus. In 2000, due to inflow of immigrants from these countries, the population of Ukraine increased by almost 8 thousand persons, while in 2002 the relevant figure reached 10 thousand and in 2003 – 8.6 thousand persons.
• In its migration exchanges with CIS countries, the Baltic States and non-CIS countries, Ukraine mainly losses its citizens of Russian and Ukrainian ethnic groups. In 2003, to a some extent, these migration losses were covered by immigration of Crimean Tatars to Ukraine (1313 persons), Armenians (611 persons), Moldavians (212 persons), Georgians (285 persons).
• Migration losses in 2003 were observed in almost all regions of Ukraine, except AR Crimea, Kharkivska Oblast, Kyiv and Sevastopol. A fairly large net migration surplus was registered in Kyiv (22.2 thousand persons).
• In the last decade, the migration legislation of Ukraine was developed in two phases, separated by approval of the Constitution of Ukraine on June 28, 1996. Before June 1996, the basic framework for regulation of migration processes was established, including approval of framework laws "On Citizenship of Ukraine"”, ”On the State Border of Ukraine”, ”On Refugees”, ”On Legal Status of Foreigners”, ”On Procedures of Entry to Ukraine and Departure from Ukraine of Citizens of Ukraine”. In parallel, implementing regulations were approved to provide mechanisms for implementation of the above laws. After approval of the Constitution of Ukraine, the key objectives in the sphere of migration management were defined by the need to harmonise the due legislation with requirements of the Constitution and applicable international human rights agreements, ratified by Ukraine from the one hand, and the need to complete development of the migration legislation of Ukraine, from the other hand. By 2001, these works were largely completed.
• Migration management is regulated by laws of Ukraine exclusively. The sphere of migration management covers both legal and illegal migration. The State Committee of Ukraine for Nationalities and Migration is the leading governmental body in charge of management of legal migration, while the Ministry of Interior is the leading governmental body in charge of combating illegal migration. Now, Ukraine considers issues of establishment of a single governmental agency in charge of migration management.
• The State Committee of Ukraine for Nationalities and Migration fulfils its migration management functions in the sphere of legal migration in close co-operation with other executive bodies. Implementation of co-ordinated joint actions with the Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy, the Ministry of Public Health and the State Committee of Ukraine for the State Border Security allows to address problems associated with refugees and legal immigrants in Ukraine.
• In the sphere of combating illegal migration, the Ministry of Interior fulfils its functions in close co-operation with the State Border Guard Service.
• Law of Ukraine on Legal Status of Foreigners defines the following migration flows to Ukraine: immigrants; persons who migrate to Ukraine for temporary employment; persons who temporarily stay in Ukraine legally; persons who may qualify for asylum in Ukraine according to the Constitution of Ukraine and the due legislation of Ukraine; foreigners and stateless persons who may be granted refugee status according to Law of Ukraine on Refugees; illegal migrants.
• Conditions and procedures of immigration of foreigners and stateless persons to Ukraine are defined by Law of Ukraine on Immigration, that stipulates immigration quotas and specifies powers of bodies in charge of immigration management in Ukraine. There are legal and illegal immigrants. The immigration quotas are set by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine for specific categories of immigrants.
• The majority of immigrants to Ukraine (three quarters) belong to non-quota immigrants (80807 persons in 2003). The above category mainly incorporates migrants from CIS countries and the Baltic States. The number of quota immigrants is smaller - 27694 persons (25.5%). The latter category mainly incorporates persons who are relatives of citizens of Ukraine (16872 persons) or relatives of immigrants (9972 persons). On 31 March, 2004, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine introduced its immigration quota for 2004. In comprising to 2003 the quota was decreased by 9 thousands persons (from 23982 to 15130).
• One of the main contemporary migration flows is represented by repatriates - i.e. persons who voluntarily migrate to countries of their citizenship or origin for permanent residence. In 2002, bodies of the Ministry of Interior of Ukraine issued certificates on admission to citizenship of Ukraine by territorial origin to 44826 persons, while in 2003, 24226 applications on admission to citizenship of Ukraine by territorial origin were processed. Besides that, 822 persons were admitted to citizenship of Ukraine in connection with Ukrainian citizenship of their parents. Representatives of the formerly deported peoples also belong to the category of repatriates.
• Persons, who were granted refugee status in Ukraine, are entitled the same rights, freedoms and duties as citizens of Ukraine, however, with some exceptions stipulated by the Constitution of Ukraine, laws of Ukraine and international agreements of Ukraine. In 2001, there were 3040 foreigners with refugee status in Ukraine - the figure exceeds relevant numbers of refugees in Poland, Belarus and Lithuania together. According to the State Committee of Ukraine for Nationalities and Migration, in 2003, bodies of the Migration Service received 1215 applications for refugee status. From the above number of applicants, 429 persons were allowed to initiate processing of their applications for being granted refugee status in Ukraine according to the new version of Law of Ukraine on Refugees. In 2003, 56 applicants were granted refugee status, applications of 144 persons were rejected, while other applications are under review.
• Refugees who reside in Ukraine for at least three years since recognition are also eligible for immigration permits (permanent residence permits) that provide access to social and economic rights – equal to Ukrainian nationals. The quota for refugees was increased from 1400 in 2003 to 1548 in 2004.
• The majority of foreigners who applied to bodies of the Migrations Service for refugee status in Ukraine, stayed earlier in other CIS countries, but had not applied for refugee status there. After their arrival in Ukraine (generally illegally), they seek to legalise their status in Ukraine for further migration to EU Member-states.
• The range of formerly deported peoples incorporates Crimean Tatars, Bulgarians, Greeks, Armenians and Germans, who returned to Ukraine (particularly to the AR Crimea) after 1989. According to the Nation-wide Census-2001, 248.2 thousand Crimean Tatars stayed in Ukraine, including 243.4 thousand Crimean Tatars in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. According to the State Committee of Ukraine for Nationalities and Migration, as at 2000, 1767 formerly deported Germans stayed in 7 southern oblasts of Ukraine - they returned to Ukraine in 1992-1993. Besides that, 10116 Meskhetian Turks stay now in Ukraine - they migrated to Ukraine in early 1990s.
• Environmental migrants in Ukraine are represented by former residents of the radioactive contamination zone of the Chernobyl NPP. Since 1990, 15066 families and single residents were mandatory evacuated from the zone (35856 persons in total); while 31686 residents leaved the area voluntarily. At the same time, 881 persons returned later to their former places of residence in the exclusion zone as of 01.01.2004.
• Pursuant to provisions of the Program for Combating Illegal Migration for 2001-2004 (approved by Presidential Decree No. 22 of 18.01.2001), the Ministry of Interior of Ukraine, jointly with other central executive bodies, implement organisational and practical actions to combat illegal migration. In 2003, bodies of the Ministry of Interior, reported 17390 illegal migrants, deported 13548 persons from Ukraine, transferred 224 case material to units of the State Border Guard Service and the Security Service of Ukraine for initiation of criminal cases under articles 331 and 332 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Comparatively to 2002, in 2003, efficiency of control of compliance with the Rules of State of Foreigners in Ukraine and combating illegal migration somehow improved.
• Comparatively to 2002, in 2003, the number of foreigners apprehended for illegal crossing of the state border of Ukraine increased in 100%. The largest numbers of apprehended illegal migrants were registered at borders with Hungary, Belarus and Russia. Attempts to enter Ukraine illegally were mostly registered at borders with Belarus and Russia, while attempts to enter neighbouring countries illegally were mainly registered at borders of Hungary and Slovakia. In order to cross the border, illegal migrants mainly used fraudulent or altered documents.
• More serious criminal sanctions were introduced against persons who organise and facilitate illegal movements of foreigners and stateless persons through borders of Ukraine. The majority of criminal cases under article 332 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine were initiated against citizens of Ukraine and Russia.
• The majority of administrative cases under articles 185-10, 202, 203, 204, 206 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offences (CoAO) were initiated in connection with violation of the due border legislation at borders with the Russian Federation, the Republic of Moldova and the Republic of Belarus.
• According to inter-state agreements of Ukraine with neighbouring countries on transfer and admission of apprehended border violators, in 2003, Ukraine transferred 1683 foreigners to border guard services of neighbouring countries. These transfers were mainly made at borders with the Russian Federation, the Republic of Moldova and the Republic of Belarus. As for neighbouring countries, apprehended foreigners were mainly transferred to Ukraine by Poland, Slovakia and (more rarely) by Hungary.
• In terms of nationalities of foreigners, who were transferred to border guard services of neighbouring countries in 2003, they were mainly represented by citizens of Moldova, Belarus, China, India and Russia. At the same time, foreigners, who were transferred to Ukraine by border guard services of neighbouring countries, were mainly represented by citizens of China, India, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Turkey and Pakistan.
• According to the State Committee for Statistics of Ukraine, the share of registered unemployed persons relative to the employable population reached 3.6% in December 2004. However, if we assess the number of the unemployed applying the methodology of the International Labour Organisation we would get a twice higher figure, while relative to the employable population the share would reach 8.4%). High uncertainly of the labour market of Ukraine and the need to look for alternative sources of income facilitated flows of labour migration from Ukraine. According to the Institute of Social Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, as of early 2005, members of 12.1% of Ukrainian households had some experience of employment abroad.
• According to the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy of Ukraine, in 2003, 38161 persons were temporarily employed abroad - these persons were employed either directly by the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy of Ukraine (via State Employment Centres and according to bilateral employment treaties), or by employment mediation companies, that were granted official licences by the Ministry. The majority of labour migrants of the above category have hired employment in non-CIS countries.
• The most often, these labour migrants are represented by middle-age men with higher or professional education.
• The lion's share of labour migrants who work in CIS countries and the Baltic States have professional education. In the case of contracted labour migrants to non-CIS countries, shares of migrants with higher education and professional education are almost equal. Ukrainian labour migrants almost never go for employment in CIS countries and the Baltic States for more than a year. In the case of labour migration to non-CIS countries, less than 2% of Ukrainian migrants work there for more than a year.
• Foreigners also find jobs at the Ukrainian labour market: as at late 2003, there were 4138 temporarily employed foreign nationals. Two thirds of them were citizens of non-CIS countries. In 2003, more than a half of the labour migrants from CIS who applied for employment permits in Ukraine, were citizens of the Russian Federation.
• Labour migration of Ukrainian citizens abroad, as well as illegal migration in Ukraine endanger the national security of the country. These problems need a particular attention of the state to ensure they are addressed by legal and organisational measures.

 

 
Besucherzahler plentyoffish
ñ÷åò÷èê ïîñåùåíèé

Ãîëîâíà Íîâèíè Ïðî ÌÀÓ Êîíãðåñè ÌÀÓ Íàö³îíàëüí³ àñîö³àö³¿ óêðà¿í³ñò³â

Óêðà¿í³ñòèêà ó ñâ³ò³ Êîíôåðåíö³¿ Ðîäîì ç Óêðà¿íè Êîíòàêòè